Individual skill
pm-product-spec
Write a product requirements document (PRD) or spec anchored to a validated problem, with measurable requirements and surfaced risks — or review an existing one. Trigger when asked to write a PRD, product spec, user stories, technical requirements, or to review/critique an existing spec document.
pm/deliverables/product-spec/SKILL.md
Source commit 5007cd0241ccaa51ae2e4681f9618912dc10e239
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 40
- Repository last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-skills Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- design-skills Repository topic
- figma-skill Repository topic
- pm-skills Repository topic
- ux-skill Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 11,271 bytes
Read excerpt
# Product Spec / PRD Writer Skill
## How this skill behaves (read first)
Claude's default already produces a *plausible-looking* PRD on request — which is exactly the problem. The default tends to: invent requirements before the problem is pinned down, write vague targets ("fast", "user-friendly"), skip dependencies and assumptions, and phrase user stories as engineering tasks. A document that looks complete but is built on an unvalidated problem and untestable requirements is worse than no document, because teams build from it.
So this skill is **generative but gated**, and it enforces quality rather than just filling a template:
1. **Gate on the problem first.** Don't draft requirements until there's a clear, fact-based problem statement. If the user hasn't supplied one, build it with them — or flag that the spec rests on unverified assumptions.
2. **Write the right document.** PRD and spec are different artifacts for different audiences and moments — pick deliberately (see below).
3. **Enforce measurability.** Every requirement must be testable; every user story must express value; every assumption must be flagged as a risk.
4. **Self-audit before delivering** (built-in review pass — see final section).