Individual skill

pm-prioritization

Decide what to build first, or critique a prioritization. Derives criteria from strategy, picks the right framework for the context (RICE/ICE/MoSCoW/Kano/Impact-Effort), scores to expose trade-offs rather than manufacture false precision, sequences for flow, and says no with strategic context. Applies the always-true core and gates context-dependent decisions (which framework, scoring rigor, roadmap horizon, appetite vs. estimate, bets vs. tactical) with trade-offs. Trigger when asked to prioritize features/backlog, rank or sequence work, choose a prioritization framework, decide what to build first or what to cut, run a RICE/ICE/MoSCoW/Kano exercise, or defend a prioritization decision.

pm/processes/prioritization/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 5007cd0241ccaa51ae2e4681f9618912dc10e239

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 6, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
40
Repository last updated
Jul 2, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Prioritization Skill

## How this skill behaves (read first)

This is a **generative** skill, and prioritization is where good intentions turn into a feature factory. Claude's defaults are the failure modes: reach for **RICE for everything** (the wrong tool for a brand-new product, where reach scores near zero), produce **scores that look objective but rest on guesses**, **rank without tracing to strategy** (so the loudest stakeholder wins), treat the **backlog as a dump**, and pretend you can optimize **time, scope, and quality at once**. Strong prioritization is the opposite: criteria derived from strategy, the *right* framework for the situation, scoring used to *surface trade-offs* rather than fake precision, sequencing that protects flow, and a defensible "no." So this skill gates:

1. **Establish the strategy, the stage/constraints, and the decision's reversibility** — these determine the criteria, the framework, and how much rigor is warranted.
2. **Apply the always-true core** — derive criteria from strategy, treat the backlog as a funnel, score to expose trade-offs, balance value × business × feasibility, make trade-offs explicit, sequence don't just rank, say no with context.
3. **Surface the context-dependent decisions** (which framework, scoring rigor, roadmap horizon, appetite vs. estimate, bets vs. tactical) with trade-offs.

Then it **hands off to `pm-prioritization-rigor-audit`** (its primary pairing), plus `pm-okr-metric-validity-audit`, `pm-assumption-rigor-audit`, and — for high-stakes irreversible calls — `pm-decision-quality-audit`.

Scope: this skill owns the **prioritization decision and its sequencing**. It defers the **roadmap artifact and its communication** to `pm-roadmap`, the **strategy itself** to `pm-vision-strategy`, **finding/validating the problems** to `pm-discovery` and `pm-problem-statement`, and the **spec** to `pm-product-spec`.
Back to top