Individual skill
food-review
Multi-reviewer peer-review system for food & nutrition manuscripts. Simulates an editorial panel — a coordinating editor, three domain reviewers (methodology/statistics, domain/novelty, integrity/ethics), and a devil's advocate — plus a formatting-compliance check against the target journal (APA 7.0 by default, or a specific journal via journal-selector). Grounds the panel first: reads the manuscript's cited sources and the field's key literature into a knowledge base, so novelty and correctness are judged from evidence, not impression. Use for pre-submission review, reviewer reports, mock peer review, or a critique before submitting. Triggers: review my paper, peer review, referee report, reviewer reports, critique my manuscript, pre-submission review, is my paper ready, mock review, editorial review, assess novelty and rigor.
food-review/SKILL.md
Source commit 01b2158a48408a8d0e56238c04075080c793d53c
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 43
- Repository last updated
- Aug 31, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- food-science Repository topic
- food-technology Repository topic
- literature-review Repository topic
- llm Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 9,453 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 9,453 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 9,453 bytesagents/devils_advocate.mddoc · 1,600 bytesagents/format_checker.mddoc · 1,778 bytesagents/knowledge_builder.mddoc · 8,933 bytesagents/review_coordinator.mddoc · 4,062 bytesagents/reviewer_domain.mddoc · 2,026 bytesagents/reviewer_integrity.mddoc · 1,985 bytesagents/reviewer_methodology.mddoc · 2,009 bytesreferences/editorial-decisions.mddoc · 1,544 bytesreferences/ethics-integrity-checklist.mddoc · 1,718 bytesreferences/quality-rubrics.mddoc · 1,648 bytesreferences/report-format.mddoc · 7,382 bytesreferences/review-criteria.mddoc · 3,042 bytesreferences/word-review-comments.mddoc · 4,371 bytes
Read excerpt
# Food-Review — Multi-Reviewer Peer Review for Food & Nutrition Manuscripts
Give the author the review a good food-science journal would return, from a
**panel** rather than a single voice. Original work; architecture informed by open
community peer-review skills (see the repo README Acknowledgements).
## Modes
- **full** (default) — the whole panel: three domain reviewers + devil's advocate + format check, synthesized by the coordinator into an editorial decision.
- **quick** — coordinator + one blended reviewer pass; a fast readiness verdict.
- **methodology** — deep dive by `reviewer_methodology` only.
- **re-review** — re-assess a revised manuscript against the prior reports and the author's response, verifying each point was addressed.
## Panel (dispatch via the Agent tool; reviewers run in parallel)
1. **`review_coordinator`** (editor-in-chief) — sets the target journal + scope, dispatches `knowledge_builder`, then the reviewers, synthesizes their reports, resolves disagreement, and issues the decision.