Menu

Individual skill

cg-paper-writing

0upvotes

Academic paper writing for 3D vision, computer graphics, CAD, and 3D understanding. Covers NeRF, 3DGS, SLAM, point cloud, 3D shape, CAD modeling. Supports CVPR/ICCV/ECCV/SIGGRAPH venues and Chinese core journals (17 journal-specific format specs). Multi-agent adversarial review, citation integrity gates, style calibration, paper novelty/industry-value evaluation, pre-submission format audit, experiment claim verification. Use when: writing or revising a CG/3D vision paper, drafting abstract/intro/method/experiments, running adversarial review or citation integrity check, calibrating writing style to a venue, evaluating paper value, 写论文/写paper/CG论文/计算机学报投稿/软件学报投稿/图形学学报投稿/自动化学报投稿/中文核心期刊.

skills/cg-paper-writing/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 6dec9b7d8996cd27211f923fe5e2ee8c45825f0b

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 6, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
180
Repository last updated
Nov 8, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# CG Paper Writing Engine (Router)

## Evidence-first operating contract

Use this skill to improve research clarity, auditability and writing efficiency. Do not promise acceptance, predict acceptance probabilities from self-scores, or imply that simulated roles are actual journal reviewers. For conflicts among fragments, this contract and `references/review-integrity.md` take precedence over historical templates and scoring heuristics.

Start from the supplied artifacts: manuscript/version, research question, contribution type, target venue/year/track, available results and requested deliverable. Proceed with a bounded draft when inputs are incomplete; label missing evidence rather than inventing it. A focused edit does not require a full submission audit. Only certify submission readiness for checks actually completed.

For methods, experiments, novelty assessment and full-paper review, load [domain-evidence-review.md](references/domain-evidence-review.md). For Nature-family targeting, also load [top-journal-strategy.md](references/top-journal-strategy.md); resolve the exact journal and article type before applying its requirements.

Templates are optional rhetorical examples, not evidence or mandatory contribution counts. Public-paper critique and author-owned mock review differ from confidential assigned peer review: verify the venue's current AI/confidentiality rules before accepting review materials; do not process prohibited confidential submissions or generate prohibited official review content.

> **Architecture**: Axis-driven static/dynamic router. Do NOT try to apply the writing logic from memory or from this router alone. Always load fragments from disk as described below.
Back to top