Individual skill
science-consensus-report
Use when several agents or votes produced different answers and the result must be merged into one defensible statement — when running the three-vote rule, when weighting preprints against peer-reviewed evidence, when escalating an unresolved disagreement, or when writing the evidence table and gap list that a campaign report must carry.
dsh-science/skills/science/science-consensus-report/SKILL.md
Source commit 088b0228df4fbb613d00d70823a325677f4970c2
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 10, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 978
- Repository last updated
- Oct 25, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- cordis Repository topic
- deepseek-harness Repository topic
- literature-review Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- nodejs Repository topic
- reproducibility Repository topic
- research Repository topic
- scientific-writing Repository topic
- windows Repository topic
- marketing Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,228 bytes
Read excerpt
# 共识与报告:把多份结果合成一个可辩护的结论
## 三票规则
- 默认 `votes = 3`,`voteThreshold = 0.66`:三票中至少两票一致才采用。
- 三票必须**相互独立**:不同分片、不同输入顺序、不得共享中间摘要。
同一上下文里连问三次不算三票。
- **只对结论型判断投票**:纳入/排除、新颖性、审稿意见分级、字段抽取。
统计量、图表、格式转换属于确定性产物,一票即可,多票是浪费。
- 三票全不同 → 不合并、不取平均,直接按"分歧"上报。
- 两票一致但第三票给出反例证据 → 不按多数,转人工/上级裁决。
## 证据权重