Individual skill
submission-auditor
Specification-driven submission auditing for university professors. 4-agent team that compiles a professor's template, requirements doc, rubric, or exemplar into a checkable Submission Spec, audits student submissions (single or batch) against it with evidence-located findings, and produces per-student feedback reports plus a class-level pattern report. Works for any genre: lab reports, papers, theses, code projects, presentation decks. Triggers on: check submissions, format check, check against template, does this meet the requirements, lab report check, audit student work, compliance check, submission requirements, batch check, 检查作业, 格式检查, 格式审查, 实验报告检查, 论文格式, 检查是否符合要求, 批量检查, 提交规范.
submission-auditor/SKILL.md
Source commit fd0c486e61cb1f065b88133b599e8806dfaeac12
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 4, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 49
- Repository last updated
- Oct 3, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-agents Repository topic
- assessment Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- course-design Repository topic
- edtech Repository topic
- higher-education Repository topic
- pedagogy Repository topic
- syllabus Repository topic
- teaching Repository topic
- legal Derived category
- security Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 9,211 bytesagents/content_auditor_agent.mddoc · 3,103 bytesagents/format_auditor_agent.mddoc · 2,734 bytesagents/report_writer_agent.mddoc · 3,465 bytesagents/spec_compiler_agent.mddoc · 3,061 bytesreferences/spec_design_guide.mddoc · 4,657 bytestemplates/feedback_report_template.mddoc · 1,433 bytestemplates/submission_spec_template.mddoc · 2,028 bytes
Read excerpt
# Submission Auditor — Specification-Driven Submission Review
Turns "here's my standard, check their work against it" into a disciplined three-step
flow: **compile the spec → audit with located evidence → report at two altitudes**
(per-student feedback, class-level patterns). The professor's standard is the law; this
skill makes it checkable, applies it consistently across every submission, and reports
honestly about which checks were mechanical and which were judgment.
> **Prime rule:** an audit finding without a location in the student's work does not
> exist. Every finding cites where it looked ("§3 Results, p.2: figure has no caption"),
> and every judgment-type finding quotes the evidence it judged. "Generally weak
> formatting" is not a finding.
## Quick Start