Individual skill
nature-reviewer
Provide evidence-grounded mock peer review of scientific manuscripts or excerpts, covering significance, validity, and major/minor concerns. Use for 模拟审稿、投稿前自审、审稿人视角评估; not author rebuttal drafting.
skills/nature-reviewer/SKILL.md
Source commit b6ae2cac022f4aac094d50f2938a3474ba315fbc
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 53,345
- Repository last updated
- Nov 10, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- codex-skills Repository topic
- nature Repository topic
- nature-skills Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
CHANGELOG.mddoc · 4,192 bytesREADME.mddoc · 3,407 bytesREADME_EN.mddoc · 3,869 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,931 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,931 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,931 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,931 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,931 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,931 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 12,931 bytesagents/openai.yamlasset · 253 bytesmanifest.yamlasset · 2,823 bytesreferences/domain-specific-review-gates.mddoc · 10,432 bytesreferences/editorial criteria and processes.mddoc · 4,391 bytesreferences/forensic-consistency-audit.mddoc · 8,494 bytesreferences/qa-checklist.mddoc · 8,450 bytesreferences/report-structure.mddoc · 5,718 bytesreferences/review-axes.mddoc · 3,439 bytesreferences/reviewer-workflow.mddoc · 8,617 bytesreferences/role-boundaries.mddoc · 3,421 bytesreferences/source-basis.mddoc · 5,473 bytesreferences/technical-concern-taxonomy.mddoc · 6,421 bytestests/punctuation-style.mddoc · 1,812 bytestests/reviewer-independence.mddoc · 2,738 bytestests/severity-tiering.mddoc · 2,738 bytestests/test_reviewer_instruction_contracts.pyruns · 1,978 bytestests/traceable-review.mddoc · 1,746 bytes
Read excerpt
# Nature Reviewer Assessment Skill
Use this skill to simulate a `Nature`-style reviewer assessment package from the referee
side.
This skill is for reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, not for drafting the authors'
response. If the user wants rebuttal writing, route to `nature-response`.
## Default stance
- Ground the review only in the local source basis plus manuscript facts supplied by the user.
- Evaluate the manuscript against source-grounded axes: `originality`, `scientific importance`, `interdisciplinary readership`, `technical soundness`, and `readability for nonspecialists`.
- Use the 12-axis technical concern taxonomy only as an internal coverage checklist; it supplements but never replaces the five source-grounded axes.
- Return exactly `3 mutually blind reviewer reports + 1 post-review synthesis` unless the user explicitly asks for another structure.