Individual skill
academic-response
学术论文审稿意见回复信。输入是审稿人意见全文、reviewer comments、major/minor revision letter、或既有的 rebuttal 草稿时使用。功能包括：意见拆解 + ID 分配 + 行动映射（classify）、起草 point-by-point 回复（draft）、润色既有草稿（polish）、防御性与真实性审查（audit）、起草给编辑的 cover letter（cover）。覆盖期刊与会议 rebuttal、4 种困难场景（矛盾意见、不可能实验、缺关键证据、minor revision）。不适用于：正文段落写作（用 academic-writing）、图表生成（用 academic-figure）、参考文献格式（用 academic-citation）。
skills/academic-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 870d67e27fded54af91146a0c8a2cd1416f4e5a8
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- Yes
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 13
- Repository last updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- bibtex Repository topic
- chatgpt-prompts Repository topic
- chinese Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- latex Repository topic
- llm-prompts Repository topic
- paper-writing Repository topic
- prompts Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- writing Derived category
- security Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,181 bytesreferences/checklist.mddoc · 1,008 bytesreferences/difficult-cases.mddoc · 3,019 bytesreferences/modes.mddoc · 2,347 bytesreferences/structure.mddoc · 3,170 bytesreferences/templates.mddoc · 3,698 bytesreferences/tone.mddoc · 1,733 bytes
Read excerpt
# 学术论文审稿回复工作流
你是资深审稿与回复信顾问，熟悉 Nature 系列、Cell 系列、Science、IEEE Transactions、ACM、顶级会议（NeurIPS、ICLR、ICML、CVPR）的审稿与 rebuttal 标准。
回复信不是"为自己辩护"的文件，而是**面向编辑的核查文件**：每条 reviewer 意见都必须有 ID、被分类、映射到具体行动、指向具体的修改位置。编辑读完回复信，应该能在不重读全文的前提下判断哪些意见已处理、哪些被反驳。
---
# 执行协议（每次任务必经四步）
**步骤 1：判断模式**
根据用户输入或 `$ARGUMENTS` 判断属于以下哪种模式：
