Individual skill

exploiting-integer-overflow-vulnerabilities

Methodology for finding and exploiting integer overflow, underflow, truncation, and signedness bugs in native code during authorized engagements, focusing on how wrapped arithmetic in size/length calculations leads to undersized allocations, oversized copies, length-check bypasses, and downstream heap/stack overflows.

internal/tools/skills/data/binary-exploitation/exploiting-integer-overflow-vulnerabilities/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d42f381ad34843e71a42658e5c57290c713e85af

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,325
Repository last updated
Nov 9, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Exploiting Integer Overflow Vulnerabilities

## When to Use

- During authorized assessments of native code (C/C++/Rust/Go) where attacker-controlled integers feed size, length,
  count, index, or offset calculations.
- When an allocation size is computed from arithmetic (`count * elem_size`, `len - header`, `size + padding`) that can
  wrap, producing an **undersized buffer** later written with the logical (un-wrapped) size — a classic
  integer-overflow-to-heap-overflow chain.
- When a length/bounds check uses a narrow type (e.g. 1-byte size field) that can be overflowed to bypass validation
  while the real copy uses a larger value.
- When signed/unsigned confusion causes a negative input to be treated as a huge positive size.

## Critical: Concepts/Steps Most Often Missed
Back to top