Individual skill
agent-debate
Use when a consequential decision has two plausible, materially different options and you are about to pick one. Runs two opposed reviewers on the same evidence with a stated round cap, then hands the human a synthesis that names the deciding evidence.
skills/agent-debate/SKILL.md
Source commit 7e19a11bd6ad4c7ea08b5f44b75b13f7eff6feda
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 33
- Repository last updated
- Oct 30, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-collaboration Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- delegation Repository topic
- gemini Repository topic
- marketplace Repository topic
- multi-agent Repository topic
- orchestration Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 2,439 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 2,439 bytesreferences/debate_protocol.mddoc · 2,028 bytes
Read excerpt
# agent-debate
A bounded adversarial review of one consequential trade-off. Debate makes the
evidence visible to the decision maker; it does not settle truth by vote and
does not authorize implementation.
## Use only when
- both options are plausible and materially different;
- the decision is consequential enough to justify two independent reviewers;
- identifiable evidence could inform or falsify each side.
Do not debate a factual question that a direct check can settle, a naming
preference, or a decision an authorized human already made.