Menu

Individual skill

discussion-writing-guide

0upvotes

Write effective discussion sections that interpret results and impact

skills/writing/composition/discussion-writing-guide/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit bf44b3cd617fa94c8a1b254c5d1987142ca3d631

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 5, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
312
Repository last updated
Jun 19, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Discussion Writing Guide

A skill for writing compelling discussion sections in academic papers. Covers the standard structure, strategies for interpreting results, addressing limitations, connecting to existing literature, and articulating the broader implications of your findings.

## Discussion Section Structure

### The Hourglass Model

The discussion mirrors the introduction in reverse -- it starts narrow (your specific findings) and broadens to implications:

```
Introduction:  Broad context -> Specific gap -> Your question
Discussion:    Your findings -> Broader literature -> Implications
Back to top