Individual skill
research-review
Get a deep critical review of research from a fresh Codex agent or a selected Gemini, Grok, or Claude Code reviewer. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.
skills/skills-codex/research-review/SKILL.md
Source commit 2901234ad2954cd2388ced8d3aed2ed9de42803a
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 18,985
- Repository last updated
- Nov 8, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-research Repository topic
- autonomous-agent Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- ml-research Repository topic
- paper-review Repository topic
- research-automation Repository topic
- ai-tools Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 9,163 bytes
Read excerpt
# Research Review with a Selectable Reviewer
> **Codex assurance:** the fresh base reviewer is same-family. Record
> `review_independence: same-family` and `acceptance_status: provisional` in
> traces and deliverables. A selected reviewer can record cross-family accepted
> only after a completed, in-scope positive review with actual different model
> families; an unavailable reviewer is BLOCKED, never a fabricated PASS.
Get a multi-round critical review of research work from an external LLM with maximum reasoning depth.
## Constants
- REVIEWER_MODEL = `gpt-6-astra` — Model used via a secondary Codex agent, reasoning effort `ultra` (deep-audit tier). Must be an OpenAI model (e.g., `gpt-6-astra`, `gpt-6.1-sol`)
- **REVIEWER_BACKEND = `codex`** — Default: a fresh Codex reviewer at the deep-audit tier (`ultra`). Resolve `— reviewer:`, project `.aris/reviewer.json`, then this default using `reviewer_route.py` (`--host codex --tier deep`), per [reviewer-backends.md](../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md). Gemini/Antigravity, Grok, and Claude Code use that contract at every call below; legacy `oracle-pro` rules remain in `reviewer-routing.md`.