Individual skill

citation-crosscheck

Double-blind bibliographic cross-check: one agent extracts each cited entry verbatim from the local .bib, a second independently re-fetches the same paper's record from the web while blind to the .bib, and a third extractor emits a mechanical field-by-field delta to catch dropped/re-ordered authors, wrong years, wrong venues, and bad DOIs/arXiv ids. The main agent (never a shard) assigns the MATCH/MINOR/MISMATCH verdict per reference, and exports a side-by-side spreadsheet. Use when user says "citation crosscheck", "double-blind citation check", "verify bib against scholar", "bib field audit", "引用交叉核对", or before submission when bibliography FIELD accuracy (not just existence) must be certified.

skills/citation-crosscheck/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 2901234ad2954cd2388ced8d3aed2ed9de42803a

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
19,020
Repository last updated
Nov 8, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Citation Cross-Check (double-blind bib-vs-web field audit)

> 🔒 **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop`, `/schedule`, or `CronCreate`.** It is
> verdict-bearing — it emits a per-reference verdict that gates `.bib` edits (an evidence
> instrument, not a cross-model acquittal; see the acceptance-gate note in Step 2).
> Re-running it on a timer adds no signal (the verdict changes only when the
> *bibliography* changes).
> Schedule the external wait that precedes it: bibliography finalized → run once. See
> [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md).

## Why this exists (and how it differs from `citation-audit`)

`citation-audit` is a single cross-model reviewer that judges three things holistically:
existence, metadata, and **context-fit** (is the cited paper used for a claim it
Back to top