Individual skill
citation-crosscheck
Conditionally double-blind bibliographic cross-check (double-blind only when the host can isolate the web agent; a flag-only heuristic when isolation can't be attested): one agent extracts each cited entry verbatim from the local .bib, a second independently re-fetches the same paper's record from the web while blind to the .bib, and a third extractor emits a mechanical field-by-field delta to catch dropped/re-ordered authors, wrong years, wrong venues, and bad DOIs/arXiv ids. The main agent (never a shard) assigns the MATCH/MINOR/MISMATCH verdict per reference, and exports a side-by-side spreadsheet. Use when user says "citation crosscheck", "double-blind citation check", "verify bib against scholar", "bib field audit", "引用交叉核对", or before submission when bibliography FIELD accuracy (not just existence) must be certified.
skills/skills-codex/citation-crosscheck/SKILL.md
Source commit 2901234ad2954cd2388ced8d3aed2ed9de42803a
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 19,037
- Repository last updated
- Nov 8, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-research Repository topic
- autonomous-agent Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- ml-research Repository topic
- paper-review Repository topic
- research-automation Repository topic
- ai-tools Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- research Derived category
- security Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 38,756 bytesscripts/cx_verify.pyruns · 84,510 bytes
Read excerpt
# Citation Cross-Check (conditionally double-blind bib-vs-web field audit)
> **Codex mirror adaptation (normative).** This skill has no cross-model jury *by
> design* — it is an evidence instrument, not an acquittal step (see the acceptance-gate
> note in Step 2, and pair it with `citation-audit` for the cross-model verdict). A and B
> are read-only extraction shards and C emits a mechanical per-field delta, so every
> verdict is assigned by the main agent from that delta plus its own primary-source
> fetch — not by any shard and not by a reviewer model.
>
> **Blindness is NOT automatically identical across hosts — it is *conditional on
> isolation*, and the gate enforces that.** The whole cross-check rests on B never seeing
> the `.bib`. On the mainline, the `Agent` tool gives B a fresh context. On a Codex host
> the frontmatter grants **no delegation tool** (no `Agent`, no `spawn_agent` — see
> `allowed-tools`), so: