Individual skill
consistency-audit
Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".
skills/consistency-audit/SKILL.md
Source commit 014a1e7cd63f1656603daaeeadb856aed1df6869
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 180
- Repository last updated
- Nov 6, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-generated-content Repository topic
- ai-scientist Repository topic
- autoresearch Repository topic
- forensics Repository topic
- llm-agents Repository topic
- peer-review Repository topic
- research-integrity Repository topic
- ai-research Repository topic
- aris Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- security Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 41,692 bytes
Read excerpt
# Consistency Audit — the paper vs itself
Audit intra-paper self-consistency for: **$ARGUMENTS** (requires `claims.json`
from `/evidence-ledger`). Emit span-anchored `consistency-audit.findings.json`;
the deterministic adjudicator — not this skill — computes the verdict.
> 🔒 **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop`, `/schedule`, or `CronCreate`.** It is
> verdict-bearing input — it proposes the findings the deterministic adjudicator
> turns into the report. Re-firing it on a wall-clock timer adds no signal: its
> output changes only when the **paper / ledger** changes, not with the clock.
> Schedule the *external wait that precedes it* — ledger built → audit **once**.
> (Mirrors ARIS's external-cadence doctrine.)
> The flagship instrument. Internal contradiction is the single most defensible