Individual skill
adversarial-review
Run a seven-agent adversarial pipeline against a resume and cover letter before submission. Produces channel-conditional verdicts anchored to the realistic applicant pool, separates materials quality from submission expected value, and ends with a contrarian pass that can overturn the verdict.
skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md
Source commit c4c9b6f739f8b71f03404a61647dea6cebfb025d
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 27
- Repository last updated
- Aug 17, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skill Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ats Repository topic
- ats-resume Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-code-plugin Repository topic
- claude-code-skills Repository topic
- claude-plugin Repository topic
- cover-letter Repository topic
- gemini-cli Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# Adversarial Review
Seven agents try to reject the application before a recruiter gets the chance.
The output is deliberately not a single yes or no. The same materials convert at wildly different rates through a cold portal submission than through a referral, and a review that collapses those into one verdict is telling the user something false in a format that sounds authoritative.
**Announce at start:** "Running adversarial review for $ROLE. Extracting materials, launching five specialists in parallel."
**Arguments:**
- `$1` — path to a role folder containing at minimum a resume and `job_description.md`
**Example:**
```
/slushpile:adversarial-review applications/Acme/Engineering/Staff-SRE