Menu

Individual skill

x-ray-a-company

0upvotes

Corporate due-diligence workflow — resolve a brand or website to its registered legal entity, map group structure and beneficial ownership, profile officers and directors, enumerate the digital estate, and screen litigation, insolvency, procurement, sanctions, PEP and adverse media. Use when asked to check out, vet or research a company, verify a supplier or counterparty before signing or paying, or assess whether a business is real. Applies to vendor and third-party risk, KYC and KYB onboarding, M&A and investor diligence, procurement integrity, and shell-company assessment. Reference at useosint.com/skills/x-ray-a-company.

skills/x-ray-a-company/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 06243a5620b0c9c97502edd4ee9e31995a3bdccd

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 6, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
61
Repository last updated
Aug 3, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# X-ray a company

Take a brand, a website, or an invoice and produce a defensible picture of who you
are actually dealing with. Four layers — legal entity, people, infrastructure,
reputation and risk — worked in that order. Skipping the first ruins everything
after it: the trading name on the contract, the brand on the website, and the
entity liable in court are routinely three different things, and every later
finding attaches to the wrong one if you assume they match.

## Step 1 — Authorized scope

Write the target, the decision the work supports, the risk areas in scope, the
jurisdictions involved, and what is out of bounds. Read
[../../ETHICS.md](../../ETHICS.md). Corporate research on public filings is
Back to top