Individual skill
interpret-feedback
Interpret third-party feedback by running parallel internal and peer interpretations to surface intent, correctness concerns, and ambiguities. Use when the user asks to "interpret feedback", "interpret comments", "what does this feedback mean", "clarify reviewer intent", "understand this review", or "interpret these suggestions".
claude/skills/interpret-feedback/SKILL.md
Source commit d56f17f0ba88ead3a4a77fcdc884f80cd3d10d2f
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 7, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 419
- Repository last updated
- Nov 8, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- developer-tools Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- codex-skills Repository topic
- agentic-coding Repository topic
- claude-code-plugin Repository topic
- codex-plugin Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,055 bytes
Read excerpt
# Interpret Feedback
Run two independent interpretations of third-party feedback in parallel (internal + codex peer), then reconcile into enriched items with clear intent summaries. Designed for feedback where the author's intent is ambiguous or the correctness of suggestions is uncertain.
## Step 1: Identify Feedback Items
Determine the feedback to interpret:
- If feedback items are in conversation context, use them
- If a file path or URL was provided, read or fetch the content
- If called by another skill, use the items passed in
For each item, collect whatever context is available: code snippets, diffs, surrounding discussion, file paths, line numbers. More context produces better interpretation.
