Individual skill
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
scientific-skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md
Source commit 160df4d13d266411f0850c4de7ecdbd93e8b40be
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 20
- Repository last updated
- Apr 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- arxiv Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-code-plugin Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- constitutional-ai Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- open-science Repository topic
- paper-generation Repository topic
- design Derived category
- writing Derived category
- research Derived category
- education Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 23,705 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 23,705 bytesreferences/common_biases.mddoc · 11,093 bytesreferences/evidence_hierarchy.mddoc · 13,444 bytesreferences/experimental_design.mddoc · 16,068 bytesreferences/logical_fallacies.mddoc · 18,014 bytesreferences/scientific_method.mddoc · 6,100 bytesreferences/statistical_pitfalls.mddoc · 15,726 bytes
Read excerpt
# Scientific Critical Thinking
## Overview
Critical thinking is a systematic process for evaluating scientific rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB frameworks. Apply this skill for critical analysis of scientific claims.
## When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Evaluating research methodology and experimental design
- Assessing statistical validity and evidence quality
- Identifying biases and confounding in studies
- Reviewing scientific claims and conclusions
- Conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses