Individual skill

argument-strength-evaluation

After an AI agent completes a segment of legal reasoning or argumentation, it must self-assess the resulting conclusion: judge the overall strength and confidence of the argument, and identify and flag weak links in the reasoning chain. Trigger conditions include, but are not limited to: - After completing legal analysis, a reliability rating for the conclusion is needed - The user expressly requests an evaluation of the persuasiveness or reliability of a given argument - Multiple competing legal interpretations require comparison of argument strength - The reasoning involves uncertainties (unclear facts, legal gaps, contested views) that need to be flagged - Risk warnings are needed for decision-makers, explaining the limitations of the conclusion - Offensive or defensive strength of one's own or the opposing party's legal arguments must be assessed - Confidence statements must be attached in legal opinions, memoranda, or similar documents

English/skills/argument-strength-evaluation/SKILL.md

Source commit c31ef1f022be6bcb3e31c1a2374d1d8240ffa61f

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD

Yes

Scanner rules are current

No

Repository scan complete

No

Skill scan complete

No

Observed behavior

Not checked yet

Last checked

Nov 10, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.