Individual skill

interrogate

Adversarially review a diff or design with independent lenses and evidence. Use before shipping contested or high-impact changes.

skills/interrogate/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 79595c97d47b5400034fb985e67f1a00389a81af

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD: Yes
Scanner rules are current: No
Repository scan complete: No
Skill scan complete: No
Observed behavior: Not checked yet
Last checked: Nov 6, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings): 22
Repository last updated: Nov 1, 2026
License: MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

agent-skills Repository topic
ai-agents Repository topic
claude-code Repository topic
codex Repository topic
coding-agents Repository topic
cursor Repository topic
pstack Repository topic
cline Repository topic
copilot Repository topic
gemini Repository topic
design Derived category

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files

SKILL.mdcore · 921 bytes

Read excerpt

# Interrogate

Reviewers are attackers, not style voters.

1. Freeze the exact artifact/revision and acceptance criteria.
2. Cover at least these lenses: correctness/invariants, boundary/API compatibility, concurrency/state, tests/verification quality, and maintainability/reader load. Add security/performance when relevant.
3. Use independent workers/models when `delegate` exists. Otherwise run separate sequential lenses and disclose they share context.
4. Require each finding to include a concrete failure mode and evidence or a reproducible check. Reject unsupported nits.
5. The owning agent adjudicates every finding as fix, dismiss, or investigate. Never pass reviewer prose through unexamined.
6. Re-run targeted proof after accepted fixes.