Individual skill
web-design-direction-system
Resolve shared design intent and guidance.
skills/web-design-direction-system/SKILL.md
Source commit 9922fa0af0aea32443cf7365ef5024dc7797382d
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 137
- Repository last updated
- Oct 22, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- accessibility Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- codex-skills Repository topic
- frontend Repository topic
- motion Repository topic
- nextjs Repository topic
- react Repository topic
- tailwind Repository topic
- web-design Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,968 bytesagents/openai.yamlasset · 305 bytesreferences/design-guidance-evidence-loop-guide.mddoc · 4,790 bytes
Read excerpt
# Web Design Direction System
Use when shared visual intent is unresolved or a recurring design correction requires revising the governing guidance. A settled design or localized implementation goes directly to its specialist; this is not a mandatory router.
## Design Guidance Contract
When a project has repeated design decisions, a named design system, or a recurring review failure, read [the design guidance evidence loop](references/design-guidance-evidence-loop-guide.md) before changing the standard. Start with the reader's job and the strongest supported answer, then choose the smallest destination that can enforce the decision: guidance, a component primitive, a deterministic check, an exemplar, or an evaluation case.
Do not turn one screenshot, one reviewer preference, or one shipped implementation into a universal rule. Record scope, rationale, evidence, exceptions, and a bad/good example. Keep unresolved decisions visible instead of hiding them inside CSS or component code.
## Infer The Design Mode
Before choosing components or CSS, write a compact design read: