Menu

Individual skill

weekly-performance-advisor

0upvotes

Use this skill for the recurring review of a running outbound book — the Monday question of what needs attention this week. Produces a triaged list of replies waiting on an answer, the campaigns that are genuinely underperforming with the one step to fix on each, and week-over-week movement on the metrics that matter. Trigger phrasings: "how are my campaigns doing this week", "weekly outbound review", "my Monday cockpit", "campaign health at a glance", "who do I need to reply to", "which campaigns should I fix", "is my outbound trending up or down".

skills/erwann-lefevre/weekly-performance-advisor/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 5d786aad0c7b2ca59b1abf1f601f9407ca261996

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
237
Repository last updated
Oct 20, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

Applies to a book of running campaigns on a recurring cadence. Produces a reply queue in urgency order, a ranked fix list, and the week's movement.

## Two questions, in this order

A weekly review answers *who is waiting on me* and *what is broken*, and the first outranks the second every time. A prospect who replied four days ago and got nothing is a lost deal that already happened; a campaign three points below benchmark is a problem that will still be there tomorrow.

Most dashboards invert this, leading with aggregate performance because it's easier to compute. Lead with the people.

## Nothing is scored below ten sends

A campaign with six sends and one reply does not have a 17% reply rate. It has six sends.

Set a floor — ten sends per metric before it gets a status at all — and render everything under it as insufficient volume rather than as a number. Without that floor, the smallest and newest campaigns dominate every ranking, and the weekly review turns into a tour of statistical noise.
Back to top