Individual skill

accessible-color-review

Review color choices for contrast, semantic consistency, color-vision accessibility, and readable user-interface states. Use for: color accessibility review, contrast check, UI color audit, accessible palette.

.grok/skills/accessible-color-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit bf31cc83a43ed8069d0d5070c68df4250273eb29

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
14
Repository last updated
Oct 21, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Accessible Color Review

## Purpose

Review a palette, design, screenshot, or interface implementation for readability and robust semantic color use. Treat automated checks as evidence to review, not as a substitute for visual or user testing.

## Workflow

1. Identify foreground-background pairs, interactive states, data visualizations, and color-only signals.
2. Calculate or verify contrast for text and essential UI elements using the applicable accessibility target.
3. Check whether color communicates meaning consistently and whether another cue supports status, errors, and links.
4. Review color-vision risks, especially charts and success/error pairings.
5. Propose the smallest changes that improve readability while preserving the visual system.
6. Return findings with observed evidence, confidence, severity, and suggested replacements.
Back to top