Individual skill
self-refine-loop
Runs a generator-critique-reviser loop to iteratively improve agent outputs. Use for: self refine, reflexion loop, critique and revise, improve output.
.grok/skills/self-refine-loop/SKILL.md
Source commit bf31cc83a43ed8069d0d5070c68df4250273eb29
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 14
- Repository last updated
- Oct 21, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- grok Repository topic
- prompt-engineering Repository topic
- workflow-automation Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 1,707 bytes
Read excerpt
# Self Refine Loop
## When to Use
- User says **self refine** or task matches this capability
- User says **reflexion loop** or task matches this capability
- User says **critique and revise** or task matches this capability
- User says **improve output** or task matches this capability
## Workflow
1. Capture the current output and the user's quality criteria.
2. Generate a critique listing specific weaknesses (max 5 bullets).
3. Revise the output addressing every critique point.
4. Score confidence 0-10 on whether criteria are met.
5. Repeat until confidence >= 8 or 5 iterations; return best version with changelog.