Individual skill
refund-deescalation
Handles angry customers and refund requests with a validate-own-act de-escalation sequence and a refund decision matrix that weighs refund cost against customer LTV and chargeback risk. Use when someone asks "this customer is furious, what do I say", "should I approve this refund", "how do I deny a refund without losing the customer", or a conversation is emotionally charged. Do NOT use for routine, non-charged ticket responses - use support-ticket-reply instead; for diagnosing systemic patterns behind falling satisfaction scores, use csat-root-cause.
skills/refund-deescalation/SKILL.md
Source commit 97a13607d669157a4a16d5ba79b77f208319f7b9
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 24
- Repository last updated
- Oct 13, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- skill-me Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,562 bytes
Read excerpt
# Refund and De-escalation
An angry customer is not attacking the agent - they are in pain and looking for someone to fix it. De-escalation is not about calming the customer down; it is about giving them a reason to trust the company again. The costly mistake this prevents is the two-sided failure: refunding reflexively (training customers to escalate for money) or denying rigidly (converting a $49 refund request into a chargeback, a public review, and a lost account worth far more).
## Operating procedure
### Step 1: Gather inputs
Before responding, establish:
1. The exact thing that went wrong, in the customer's words.
2. The refund amount requested versus the customer's LTV (tenure × monthly value, or total historical spend). Label an LTV estimate a guess if the data is thin.
3. Whether the failure was the company's fault, ambiguous, or the customer's misunderstanding.
4. Contact history on this issue - how many touches so far.