Individual skill

budget-vs-actual

Structures a budget-vs-actual variance analysis that isolates root causes - price/volume/mix decomposition, timing vs structural expense buckets, a materiality screen, and reforecast flags - instead of restating numbers. Use when someone asks "why did we miss budget", "write the variance commentary for the board deck", "explain this expense overrun", or is closing the month and owes narrative on the P&L. Do NOT use to build the budget or plan itself - use budget-builder instead; do NOT use for a full driver-based forecast model - use fpa-model instead; do NOT use for cash timing and runway questions - use cash-flow-forecast instead.

skills/budget-vs-actual/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 97a13607d669157a4a16d5ba79b77f208319f7b9

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
24
Repository last updated
Oct 13, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Budget vs. Actual Variance Analysis

Variance analysis is diagnostic, not descriptive. A report that says revenue was 8% below budget is not analysis. Analysis says why, which team or product drove it, whether it is recoverable, and what it means for the full-year forecast. The costly failure is a wall of explanations for immaterial noise that buries the one structural miss the leadership team needed to act on.

## Operating procedure

### Step 1: Gather inputs

1. The actuals and budget at the same level of account granularity, for the period and YTD.
2. Total monthly revenue budget (it sets the materiality floor).
3. For revenue lines: budgeted and actual units and price by segment, if available. If not, note that decomposition will be directional and label it as such.
4. Known one-offs and timing shifts already identified by the accounting close (pair with month-end-close for the close itself).
5. The audience: internal ops review or board deck. Default: board-ready.
Back to top