Individual skill
prompt-engineer
Turns a vague request into a structured, reliable prompt - role, context, task, format, failure handling, and few-shot examples - that produces consistent output across real inputs. Use when someone asks "why does my prompt give inconsistent results", "write a prompt for this task", "the model keeps breaking my JSON", "how do I stop prompt injection from user input", or is building any LLM feature whose prompt was written ad hoc. Do NOT use for converting a working prompt into a reusable agent skill - use prompt-to-skill instead; do NOT use for measuring whether a prompt change improved quality - use llm-evaluation instead.
skills/prompt-engineer/SKILL.md
Source commit 97a13607d669157a4a16d5ba79b77f208319f7b9
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 24
- Repository last updated
- Oct 13, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- skill-me Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,180 bytes
Read excerpt
# Prompt Engineer
Turn a vague request into a prompt that produces consistent, high-quality output on inputs you have not seen yet. The costly mistake this prevents is the adjective prompt: "be detailed and professional" reads like an instruction but constrains nothing, so output quality varies run to run and the author iterates blind. Structure and examples constrain; adjectives decorate.
## Operating procedure
Ordering inside the prompt is load-bearing, not stylistic. For short context, state the task before the context so the model reads the data already knowing what to do with it. For long documents (roughly 20K+ tokens), put the documents first and the question and instructions at the end, which measurably improves answers on long inputs. Either way, restate the most important constraint last.
### Step 1: Gather inputs
1. The single objective, stated in one sentence. If it takes two sentences, it is two prompts - split into a chain.
2. 3-5 real example inputs, including one ugly one. Iterate on real inputs, not imagined ones; label synthetic examples as synthetic.
3. Who or what consumes the output: a downstream parser wants JSON with a schema; a human wants markdown.
4. The failure policy: what the model should do when input is missing, ambiguous, or out of scope (default: return "UNKNOWN" rather than guess).