Menu

Individual skill

legal-risk-assessor

0upvotes

Sets out the realistic options on a decision a client faces, with the downside risk, the likely outcome, and the best case of each — to inform the client's decision, not to make it for them. Use this whenever a user is weighing options and wants the risk of each worked through — including phrasings like "what are our options here and how risky is each", "should we settle or litigate, what's the downside of each", "lay out the risk of disclosing versus not disclosing", "what could go wrong if we sign versus if we walk away", or "help the client weigh this decision". Distinct from legal-opinion-drafter, which answers one legal question — this compares multiple options against what the client actually cares about (cost, time, certainty, relationship, reputation). Fires for any legal decision with more than one realistic path, in any practice area.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/legal-risk-assessor/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Legal Risk Assessor

I am using the **Legal Risk Assessor** skill from Rohas Legal AI: sets out the options on a decision, with the risk and likely outcome of each. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Takes a decision a client faces and sets out the realistic options, what could go wrong with each and how likely and severe that is, and the realistic best and likely case alongside the downside — organised around what the client has actually said matters to them. It supports the client's decision; it does not make it. Where the analysis depends on a legal question — how likely a claim is to succeed, whether a position would hold up — it grounds that in supplied authority or flags it as needing research, rather than asserting a probability from memory.

## Before you start

**The decision and the options actually on the table.** Stated by the user, not invented. If the options have not been clearly identified, ask the user to state what is realistically available before drafting anything — including whether "do nothing" or maintaining the status quo is genuinely one of them, since it is often implicitly excluded without being ruled out on the merits.

**What matters to the client.** Cost, time, certainty, reputation, preserving the relationship, precedent for future disputes — whichever mix actually applies. This is blocking: risk is not one-dimensional, and the same option can be low financial risk and high reputational risk at once. Which matters more is the client's call, not an assumption to make on their behalf.
Back to top