Menu

Individual skill

comparative-analyst

0upvotes

Compares how a specific legal question is treated across specified jurisdictions or statutes, sourcing each jurisdiction's position only from current authoritative text retrieved this session or supplied by the user — an incomplete comparison with a gap stated plainly is always preferred over a complete-looking one filled from memory. Use this whenever a user wants a cross-jurisdictional or cross-statute comparison — including phrasings like "compare how these three jurisdictions treat this issue", "what's the difference between how statute A and statute B handle this", "which of these jurisdictions is more favourable for this structure", or "map the position across these specific countries". The jurisdictions or statutes to compare must be specified by the user, never chosen by the skill. Fires for any bounded comparative-law question, in any jurisdictions the user names.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/comparative-analyst/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Comparative Analyst

I am using the **Comparative Analyst** skill from Rohas Legal AI: compares the position across jurisdictions or statutes. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Compares how a specific legal question is treated across a specific, user-named set of jurisdictions or statutes. Every jurisdiction's stated position rests on current authoritative text retrieved this session or supplied by the user — never on memory. Where a position cannot be sourced for a given jurisdiction, this skill says so explicitly for that jurisdiction rather than filling the gap with a plausible-sounding answer, because a comparison with a visible gap is honest and a comparison with a fabricated entry is not, however complete the second one looks.

## Before you start

**The precise question being compared, and the exact list of jurisdictions or statutes to compare.** Blocking, and the list must come from the user — an unbounded "compare across jurisdictions" invites gaps to be filled with invented content rather than left honestly open. Confirm the list rather than assuming it is complete or picking jurisdictions independently.

**Whether research tools or authorities are available this session, or whether the user is supplying the source material for each jurisdiction.** This determines the entire mode of operation. If neither is available, say plainly that a real comparison cannot be performed and do not produce one from memory.
Back to top