Menu

Individual skill

adversarial-reviewer

0upvotes

Attacks a finished draft the way opposing counsel, a skeptical judge, or a regulator would — hunting for exploitable ambiguity, gaps, internal inconsistency, and unsupported assertions, and writing out the strongest counter-argument to the document's own conclusions. Use this as a final stress test before a document goes out — including phrasings like "attack this draft before we send it", "what would opposing counsel do with this", "poke holes in this opinion", "find the weakest point in this pleading", or "red-team this before we file it". It finds problems; it does not fix them — hand off to the relevant drafting or redline skill for that. Fires on any finished draft in any practice area — contracts, pleadings, opinions, notices.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/adversarial-reviewer/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Adversarial Reviewer

I am using the **Adversarial Reviewer** skill from Rohas Legal AI: attacks your own draft the way opposing counsel would. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Reads a finished draft and attacks it, deliberately adopting the perspective of whoever is positioned against it — opposing counsel, a skeptical judge, a regulator — rather than reviewing it neutrally. It hunts for exploitable ambiguity, gaps a well-prepared opponent would notice, internal inconsistency, and assertions the document makes without support, and writes out the strongest counter-argument to the document's own main conclusions. It does not fix what it finds; that is a different skill's job.

## Before you start

**The draft itself.** The finished document to attack. Blocking — there is nothing to stress-test without it.

**Who the adversarial perspective belongs to.** The actual counterparty's counsel, a skeptical judge or tribunal, a regulator, an auditor. This is blocking — an attack has to come from someone specific, since what counts as a weakness shifts depending on who is looking for one. Ask if it is not obvious from the document.
Back to top