Individual skill

party-interest-analyst

Separates each party's stated position from their actual underlying interests, for both sides of a dispute, tagging every interest as confirmed from direct instruction or inferred from conduct — and maps where positions conflict but interests might not, without pretending every conflict has a win-win answer. Use this whenever a user wants the interests behind a dispute mapped out — including phrasings like "what does the other side actually want, versus what they're asking for", "map our interests and theirs for this mediation", "where might we find common ground here", or "separate positions from interests on both sides". Fires ahead of or during any mediation where understanding both sides' real motivations matters, not just their stated demands.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/party-interest-analyst/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Party Interest Analyst

I am using the **Party Interest Analyst** skill from Rohas Legal AI: separates stated positions from underlying interests on both sides. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Maps each party's stated position against their actual underlying interests, for both sides of a dispute — the classic distinction between what a party says they want and why they actually want it. It works with real uncertainty about the other side's interests, labelling every inference as an inference rather than presenting a guess as a fact, and it identifies where positions conflict but interests might not — the openings a mediation can actually use — without pretending every point of conflict has an integrative solution when some genuinely do not.

## Before you start

**What is known about each party's stated position and the facts of the dispute.** Blocking — the analysis has to start from what has actually been said or observed, not from a general sense of the dispute.

Not blocking: **how much is actually known about the other party's interests.** This is often limited. Work with that uncertainty directly rather than filling gaps with confident-sounding guesses — every inference about the other side gets labelled as an inference in the output.
Back to top