Menu

Individual skill

clause-comparator

0upvotes

Compares the same clause or provision across draft rounds, precedents, public agreements or a portfolio and reports what differs in wording and effect. Use for version-change requests and external clause benchmarking, including "what changed between drafts", "compare their indemnity with ours", "compare liability caps across these SaaS agreements", "what indemnity approach is most common in public SaaS agreements", "what is typical", "what is prevalent" or "is this market standard". External frequency claims require a disclosed multi-document sample, not one precedent. Distinct from contract-reviewer, which grades an agreement for risk; this stays neutral unless a side is given. Fires for any clause type in any commercial agreement.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/clause-comparator/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Clause Comparator

I am using the **Clause Comparator** skill from Rohas Legal AI: compares the same clause across drafts or against a standard. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Takes the same clause, or the same clause type, as it appears in two or more places and reports what is different — mechanically, in the wording, and substantively, in what the clause now does. It is a comparison tool, not a review: it does not grade an agreement's overall risk, and it does not draft new wording for a clause that has no comparator (that is redline-proposer). It compares what it is given; it does not supply a "market standard" from memory to compare against.

## Before you start

**What is being compared, and against what.** At minimum this means whether the comparator is another draft, a supplied precedent or an external portfolio. For user-supplied material, identify each document, version or date and clause number before diffing. For an external portfolio benchmark, the user need only identify the clause type and target population, such as public SaaS agreements; discover the documents using the default sample and source rules in [references/public-contract-sources.md](references/public-contract-sources.md) rather than asking the user to name them.

**The comparator text itself, where it is a supplied "standard".** If the user asks to compare against their firm's standard, obtain its actual text — a template clause, precedent document or pasted example. If the user instead asks for an external market benchmark, collect the actual clause text from the public documents found under the external-source rules. Never reconstruct a market-standard clause from memory.
Back to top