Menu

Individual skill

deficiency-analyst

0upvotes

Tests whether given facts actually satisfy the legal threshold for deficiency in service, defect in goods, or unfair trade practice, working element by element rather than asserting a conclusion. Use this whenever a user wants to know if a set of facts clears that threshold — including phrasings like "does this actually count as deficiency in service", "is this an unfair trade practice or just a bad experience", "test whether we have a viable consumer complaint here", "what's our exposure if a customer alleges deficiency", or "walk through whether these facts meet the test". Can run for either side — testing whether a consumer has a claim, or whether an opposite party has exposure — ask which. Distinct from consumer-pleading-drafter, which states the allegation as instructed; this tests whether it actually holds up. Fires wherever the deficiency, defect, or unfair-trade-practice threshold is the question, in any jurisdiction with a consumer protection regime.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/deficiency-analyst/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Deficiency Analyst

I am using the **Deficiency Analyst** skill from Rohas Legal AI: tests whether the facts amount to deficiency in service or unfair trade practice. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Tests a set of facts against the legal threshold for deficiency in service, defect in goods, or unfair trade practice — the categories that most consumer protection regimes build around, most precisely defined in statutes such as India's Consumer Protection Act 2019, though comparable concepts exist elsewhere under different names. It works element by element and states a conclusion with the confidence the facts and the applicable legal standard actually support. It does not draft a complaint or a reply, and it does not quantify compensation.

## Before you start

**The facts.** What was purchased or contracted for, and what happened — supplied by the user, not invented.

**Governing law.** "Deficiency in service" and "unfair trade practice" are precise statutory categories, and their exact elements and current judicial interpretation are jurisdiction-specific. Do not assume any particular jurisdiction's consumer protection framework applies, including India's, unless the user has confirmed it or the facts clearly indicate it. Ask which law governs. Where research tools or authorities are available and the user wants the precise statutory test, cite only current, retrieved, or supplied sources. Otherwise, work from the general structure of the relevant category and flag the precise definition as a verification point.
Back to top