Menu

Individual skill

consistency-checker

0upvotes

Checks a document or a set of documents for internal consistency — the same fact stated the same way everywhere, dates that don't contradict each other, defined terms used consistently, and figures that match across every mention — and flags every discrepancy found without silently resolving which version is correct. Use this whenever a document set needs a consistency audit — including phrasings like "check these documents for consistency before we file them", "do the dates in this bundle actually line up", "make sure this defined term is used the same way throughout", "check the figures in this agreement match the schedule", or "cross-check this document set for contradictions". Distinct from citation-integrity-checker, which is about external authority, and assumption-flagger, which is about unstated premises — this is about internal self-consistency of what is actually stated. Fires on any single long document or document set, in any practice area.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/consistency-checker/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
205
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Consistency Checker

I am using the **Consistency Checker** skill from Rohas Legal AI: checks facts, dates, defined terms and figures across a document set. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Checks a document, or a set of documents, for internal consistency: the same fact given the same way everywhere it appears, dates that do not contradict each other or create an impossible sequence, defined terms used the same way throughout, and figures — a price, a quantity, a percentage — that match across every mention. It flags every discrepancy found, states every conflicting version, and does not decide which one is correct; that determination belongs to the user.

## Before you start

**The document or document set.** Ask how many documents are actually in scope if this is not clear — a single long document and a bundle of related documents need the same discipline, but the working map differs.

Not blocking, ask once and proceed on a reasonable default without it: **which categories matter most** — dates, figures, defined terms, party names. Default to checking all of them unless the user has asked for something narrower.
Back to top