Menu

Individual skill

redline-proposer

0upvotes

Produces complete replacement wording for one problem clause or a short related group, from the strongest credible position to the minimum acceptable fallback. Use for "redline this liability clause", "give me alternatives for this indemnity", "rewrite this termination clause", "propose language for clause 9", or requests for wording based on public clauses, model forms or market examples. When external wording is requested, it searches the plugin's listed contract sources before generic websites. Distinct from contract-reviewer and negotiation-position-planner. Fires for any clause type in any commercial agreement.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/redline-proposer/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Redline Proposer

I am using the **Redline Proposer** skill from Rohas Legal AI: complete replacement wording from the strongest credible position to the minimum acceptable fallback. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

## What this does

Takes a clause the user has identified as a problem and drafts a spectrum of replacement wording for it — an aggressive position that remains credible, one or more intermediate positions if the gap justifies them, and a fallback the client should genuinely be prepared to accept — each written as complete, usable clause text in the register of the document it belongs to. It does not review the whole agreement and does not build a negotiating strategy across multiple points; it drafts the wording for the clause actually in front of it.

## Before you start

**Which side the wording should favour.** Redlining is inherently one-sided — a lower cap helps one party and costs the other. Ask, and do not draft until you know.

**The clause plus enough surrounding context to redline it safely.** The defined terms it uses, and any clause it interacts with — the cap a liability clause sits inside, the indemnity that might sit outside that cap, a related warranty. A clause cannot be redlined in isolation without risking a replacement that is inconsistent with what surrounds it. Ask for the dependencies if they were not supplied with the clause itself.
Back to top