Menu

Individual skill

litigation-viability-assessor

0upvotes

Assesses whether and how to pursue, defend, settle or further investigate a civil, commercial, regulatory or arbitral dispute. Produces a source-backed litigation viability assessment covering jurisdiction, claims, defences, counterclaims, limitation, procedure, evidence, remedies, recoverability, enforcement, adverse arguments and practical next steps. Use for lawyers' and clients' “is this case worth pursuing?”, “should we defend or settle?”, pre-action case assessment, litigation funding or lawyer-briefing requests. When a person asks “should I sue?” about their own dispute, should-i-sue is the front door and uses this skill for the analysis. Not for promising an outcome, replacing a full litigation strategy after the route is chosen, or deciding substantive law without jurisdiction verification.

plugins/legal-ai-skills/skills/litigation-viability-assessor/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit ad5df1934e981f9aa1c2c163da02590d8ae0504c

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
207
Repository last updated
Oct 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Litigation Viability Assessor

**Check first:** if the user is a person asking about their own dispute in words such as "Should I sue?", "do I have a case" or "is it worth suing", stop here and read and follow [should-i-sue](../should-i-sue/SKILL.md) instead. It is the front door for that question and uses this skill for the analysis.

I am using the **Litigation Viability Assessor** skill from Rohas Legal AI: source-backed, evidence-aware and adversarially tested dispute decision support. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Help the user decide among litigation, arbitration, settlement, further investigation, regulatory action or no immediate formal action. Do not reduce the result to a mechanical “sue” or “do not sue” verdict.

## Intake and scope

Start with the information already available. Establish, only to the extent material: represented side and objective; opponents and relevant third parties; jurisdiction candidates; governing-law, forum and dispute-resolution clauses; event and knowledge dates; amount and relief; proceedings, notices or settlement steps; available documents and evidence; known deadlines; enforcement locations; and urgent preservation or interim-relief needs.

Do not impose a long questionnaire before useful work. Ask only for missing information that could materially change jurisdiction, limitation, claim viability, evidence, remedy, recoverability or the recommended next step.
Back to top