Individual skill

ulw-interview

[omh] Vague, underspecified request: one-question-at-a-time clarification. Use when the user says: deep-interview, interview me, clarify, feature shaping, ambiguous product request, one question, 要件を詰めて, 曖昧な要求.

agent-skills/ulw-interview/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 98284f305f6a9dce6e36a1580c9f333105f1a950

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
5,325
Repository last updated
Nov 10, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Deep Interview

This is an OMH `deep-interview` workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

## Why This Exists

`deep-interview` exists to stop the host from guessing through ambiguous product, workflow, or implementation intent; it converts uncertainty into a clarified brief before planning or handoff.

## Do Not Use When

- The request already has concrete scope, acceptance criteria, and verification commands.
- The missing information is discoverable from the repository or local artifacts without asking the user.
- The user asked for immediate read-only analysis and the ambiguity does not change the answer.
- The ambiguity is specifically repository terminology or project-language alignment; use `ulw-context` and its direct-lookup/frontier boundary.
Back to top