Menu

Individual skill

vendor-scoring

0upvotes

Vendor evaluation scorecard framework. Referenced by vendor-comparator and evaluation-designer agents when systematically comparing and evaluating vendors. Used for 'vendor evaluation', 'supplier comparison', 'bid evaluation' requests. Note: posting bid announcements and executing contracts are out of scope.

en/95-procurement-docs/.claude/skills/vendor-scoring/skill.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 8e8d35c6a19166614d1af1df85512266d51121ae

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,324
Repository last updated
Mar 22, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Vendor Scoring — Vendor Evaluation Scorecard

Enhances the vendor evaluation capabilities of vendor-comparator / evaluation-designer agents.

## Evaluation Criteria Framework

### Standard Evaluation Categories

| Category | Weight (Default) | Sub-items |
|----------|-----------------|-----------|
| Technical Fit | 30% | Requirement fulfillment, technical capability, innovation |
| Price Competitiveness | 25% | Unit price, TCO, price structure transparency |
| Track Record/Reliability | 20% | Similar projects, references, financial stability |
| Service/Support | 15% | SLA, response speed, training, maintenance |
Back to top