Individual skill
investigation-hub-production-gap-analysis
Produce a structured-JSON litigation e-discovery gap / production-readiness / remediation analysis for an investigation matter whose evidence lives in a read-only "Investigation Review Hub". Use when a task gives a matter_id, points at a review hub as the source of record, and asks for a JSON object conforming to a provided answer_template.json (critical findings, category statuses, retention/communication gaps, privilege corrections, top risks, metrics, prioritized actions, etc.). Covers subpoena/grand-jury/SEC/DOJ production reviews across custodian collection, preservation/retention loss, privilege logging, third-party waiver, and QC/responsiveness coding.
experiments/claude_code_opus_4_8_xhigh/reports/skills/task_group_017/reflect-3/reflect-3_attempt_01/SKILL.md
Source commit 5082a777379156a048881e94940d640702e5e09a
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 121
- Repository last updated
- Oct 29, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- benchmark Repository topic
- llm Repository topic
- self-evolving Repository topic
- self-learning Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,279 bytesreferences/classification-and-enum-mapping.mddoc · 5,718 bytesreferences/hub-data-model.mddoc · 3,890 bytesreferences/material-vs-distractor.mddoc · 3,008 bytes
Read excerpt
# Investigation Review Hub — production gap analysis
These tasks share one shape: a legal team wants a normalized JSON assessment of
what is wrong with a rolling production for one matter. The prose, the client
name, and the output field names change; the underlying data model and the
reasoning do not. Solve it by pulling the matter's records from the hub,
separating the few **material** records from a large field of look‑alike
**distractors**, deriving exact counts, classifying each with domain rules, and
emitting JSON that conforms exactly to the task's `answer_template.json`.
## What the task hands you
- A **prompt** naming a `matter_id` and the deliverable.
- `input/payloads/answer_template.json` — the output contract: required top‑level