Individual skill

work-humanizer

Edit AI-sounding text so it reads like a careful person wrote it, without changing what it says or commits to. Built for work writing where the wording matters: sales and marketing copy, support replies, HR and legal letters, emails, docs, release notes, posts, landing pages. Two modes. Rewrite: edit the text you are given. Interview: when a draft is AI-composed and thin, ask the writer 3-5 sharp questions and build the piece from their answers, in their words. Also writes from the writer's own notes or a voice-memo transcript. Calibrated on measured differences between human and AI writing.

base/.agents/skills/work-humanizer/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d66f0fd9976e15ca51d6fcd5352482c5c66c281b

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 4, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
19
Repository last updated
Nov 5, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# work-humanizer

Make the text read like a specific person wrote it for a specific reader. Keep every fact. Invent nothing.

Three things we measured shape everything below:

1. **Readers notice texture.** Emphasis with no information in it, uniform rhythm, generic claims, and sentences that do the reader's thinking for them. Those are fixable by editing.
2. **Detectors read composition, not words.** A human-written article stayed 99-100% human on a commercial detector after AI formatting, an AI copyedit, and a full AI sentence-by-sentence rephrase. The same piece composed by AI from its outline scored 68% human, and a style-targeted rewrite of that AI version moved it one point. In our October 2026 test, rewrites of AI drafts by this skill, by blader/humanizer, and by a bare prompt all stayed AI on that detector, while versions built from the writer's own sentences scored human roughly in proportion to how many of those sentences survived. An assistant model rewording a draft does not change who composed it. (A paraphrase model trained against detectors did flip the score, and in the same test it cost meaning and quality.) Never promise "undetectable". If the writer needs text that is genuinely theirs, use interview mode.
3. **Specifics carry the human signal.** Density of numbers, names, and dates was the one signal that tracked reader response across the creators we studied. You may only use specifics that are in the source or that the writer gives you.

## Pick the mode

**Rewrite mode** (default). The user gives you text; you edit it.