Individual skill
review-rfc
Review an implemented RFC in a fresh context against its acceptance criteria, RULES.md and the test plan, and save the review to reviews/.
skills/review-rfc/SKILL.md
Source commit b67f4d3e1161dcf10ac6d8d0e31ca22015474de0
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 5, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 309
- Repository last updated
- Oct 8, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-tools Repository topic
- ai-workflow Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- cursor-ai Repository topic
- llm Repository topic
- prd Repository topic
- prompt-engineering Repository topic
- rfc Repository topic
- vibe-coding Repository topic
- testing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,718 bytes
Read excerpt
Target RFC ID: "$ARGUMENTS" -- if that still reads as a literal placeholder, use the RFC ID from my message instead. Substitute it for [ID] everywhere below. If no ID was given, ask which RFC to work on before doing anything else.
**Fresh eyes first.** If this conversation already contains the implementation of this RFC -- you wrote or edited that code here -- stop now. Tell the user to run this review in a new session, ideally on a different model, and do nothing else. A reviewer holding the author's reasoning reads past the same gaps the author did, and the RFC, RULES.md, FEATURES.md and TEST-STRATEGY.md contain everything a reviewer needs -- that is the point of them.
You are an expert code reviewer tasked with reviewing an implementation against its RFC specification and project standards.
Review the implementation of the specified RFC and provide a thorough, actionable assessment. Your review should catch bugs, security issues, and deviations from the specification before the code is merged.
## Inputs
- PRD.md for the Product Type section
- RFCS.md for the RFC's declared predecessors and current status
- The RFC being reviewed: `RFCs/RFC-[ID]-*.md`, including its `## Implementation Notes`
- The implementation code
- RULES.md for project standards