Individual skill
ai-agent-reliability
Make an AI agent or automation reliable enough to trust — the tests, checks, and guardrails that catch its failures before they reach anything real. Use when asked how do I test my AI agent, make my automation reliable, my agent works sometimes, or how do I trust an AI workflow in production. Produces a map of where the agent can fail (bad input, hallucination, wrong tool call, edge cases, silent errors), the checks that catch each (validation, evals on real cases, human-in-the-loop gates, monitoring), a right-sized reliability plan scaled to the stakes, and a rollout that earns trust incrementally.
plugins/pm-ai-native/skills/ai-agent-reliability/SKILL.md
Source commit f7c90bc09ee05dc25cf257bdb1826f2c2552c2cb
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,540
- Repository last updated
- Nov 10, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- product-management Repository topic
- productivity Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- chatgpt Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- cursor Repository topic
- gemini Repository topic
- prompt-engineering Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- testing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,979 bytes
Read excerpt
# AI-Agent Reliability
An AI agent that works in a demo and one you can trust in production are different things — the gap is everything that happens when input is messy, the model hallucinates, a tool call goes wrong, or an error fails silently. This maps where your agent can fail and the specific checks that catch each, scaled to the stakes, plus a rollout that earns trust incrementally — so "works sometimes" becomes "works reliably."
## What This Skill Produces
- **A failure map** — where this agent can go wrong: bad/unexpected input, hallucinated output, wrong or malformed tool calls, unhandled edge cases, silent failures, and runaway loops
- **The catching checks per failure** — input validation, output verification, evals on real cases, schema/format checks on tool calls, human-in-the-loop gates, and monitoring/alerts
- **An eval approach** — testing on a real set of cases (including the hard ones) so quality is measured, not assumed, and regressions are caught
- **Human-in-the-loop placement** — where a human must approve, scaled to consequence (irreversible/external actions gated, low-stakes automated)
- **A right-sized plan** — reliability effort matched to the stakes, not gold-plating a low-risk toy or under-testing a high-risk system
- **A trust-building rollout** — shadow mode → low-stakes → expand, with monitoring, rather than shipping it everywhere and hoping
## Required Inputs