Menu

Individual skill

disagreeing-experts

0upvotes

Put one situation in front of three professionals chosen to disagree — the lawyer, the accountant, and the therapist read the same divorce — each ruling independently, with the conflicts surfaced in a disagreement table instead of blended into mush. Use when asked for different professional perspectives, what would a lawyer versus an accountant say, I keep getting one-sided advice, or pressure-test this from multiple angles. Produces three independent readings, the disagreement table with why the frames diverge, and the decision map of which expert to weight for which sub-decision. The anti-consensus skill: it never averages.

plugins/pm-thinking/skills/disagreeing-experts/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit f7c90bc09ee05dc25cf257bdb1826f2c2552c2cb

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,539
Repository last updated
Nov 9, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Disagreeing Experts Skill

Ask one professional and you get their profession's answer: the lawyer sees exposure, the accountant sees the tax year, the therapist sees what the fight is actually about — and each is right inside their frame while the frames point different directions. Ask an AI and you usually get something worse: all three blended into an even-handed paste where the conflicts, which were the information, have been smoothed away. This skill refuses the blend. It picks the three professionals *most likely to disagree* about your situation, has each read it cold and rule independently — verdict, reasoning, what they would ask first, what they would charge you to stop doing — and then puts the disagreements in a table, named and explained. Because where experts disagree is exactly where your real decision lives.

## What This Skill Produces

- **The panel selection** — three professions chosen for maximum productive disagreement about *this* situation, with the reason each earned a seat
- **Three independent readings** — each expert's verdict and reasoning in their own professional register, written as if the others do not exist
- **The disagreement table** — every point of conflict: who says what, why their frames diverge, and what fact would settle it
- **The convergence list** — the short set all three agree on, which is as informative as the conflicts and usually actionable immediately
- **The first-question set** — what each expert would ask before advising, since the questions reveal each frame's blind spots in the others
- **The decision map** — which expert to weight for which sub-decision, replacing "who is right" with "right about what"

## Required Inputs
Back to top