Individual skill
public-comment
Draft a persuasive public comment on a proposed rule, regulation, or plan. Use when asked to comment on a rulemaking, respond to a consultation, submit feedback on a proposed regulation, or write a comment to an agency. Produces a structured comment: your position, specific evidence-based arguments tied to the proposal's text, suggested edits, and the impact — the kind agencies must consider on the record.
skills/public-comment/SKILL.md
Source commit e0009a385c480fb0b5687e7412df67c7c64f7cee
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 12, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,541
- Repository last updated
- Nov 11, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- product-management Repository topic
- productivity Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- chatgpt Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- cursor Repository topic
- gemini Repository topic
- prompt-engineering Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,530 bytes
Read excerpt
# Public Comment Skill
Agencies must review and respond to substantive comments — but only *substantive* ones move the needle. A
comment that cites the specific provision, brings evidence, and proposes concrete alternative language carries
far more weight than "I support/oppose this." This skill drafts that substantive comment.
## Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- **The proposal** — the rule/regulation/plan, ideally the specific sections or docket number.
- **Your position & interest** — support, oppose, or amend; and who you are (individual, business, org — it affects standing/weight).
- **The substance** — your reasons, and any data, expertise, or real-world impact you can cite.
- **Desired outcome** — the specific change you want (kill it, delay it, amend a provision).