Individual skill

from-first-principles

Strip a problem down to what's actually true — the physics, economics, and human basics — and rebuild the answer from there, ignoring 'how it's normally done'. Use when asked to think from first principles, why is this done this way, challenge the assumptions here, or rebuild this from scratch. Produces the problem reduced to its fundamental truths, the inherited assumptions and conventions named and questioned, and a solution reasoned up from the basics — which often looks nothing like the default because the default was just copied.

plugins/pm-thinking/skills/from-first-principles/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit f7c90bc09ee05dc25cf257bdb1826f2c2552c2cb

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 5, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,532
Repository last updated
Nov 7, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# From First Principles

Most answers are reasoned by analogy — "this is how it's done, so we do it too." First-principles thinking throws that out: it breaks the problem down to what's *actually, physically, economically* true, then rebuilds from those basics. The result often diverges sharply from convention, because the convention was inherited, not derived.

## What This Skill Produces

- **The fundamentals** — the problem reduced to what's genuinely true (constraints from physics, math, economics, human needs), not what's assumed
- **The inherited assumptions** — the "that's just how it's done" beliefs, named and questioned (which are real constraints, which are just convention?)
- **The rebuild** — a solution reasoned upward from the fundamentals
- **The divergence** — where this differs from the default, and why the default existed anyway

## Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided: