Menu

Individual skill

performance-review

0upvotes

Write structured, balanced performance reviews from bullet-point inputs. Use when asked to write a performance review, self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, or manager evaluation. Produces a complete, fair, professionally written review covering achievements, areas for growth, and development goals.

skills/performance-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit e0009a385c480fb0b5687e7412df67c7c64f7cee

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 12, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,542
Repository last updated
Nov 11, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Performance Review Skill

This skill turns rough notes, bullet points, or bullet-point memories into a complete, professionally written performance review. Output is ready to submit or use as a strong first draft.

> **Not quite this?** Use `ai-assisted-performance-review` when much of the person's output was produced with AI tools and attribution matters.

## Required Inputs

Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked *(assumed, confirm)* and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about).
- **Review type** (Self-assessment / Manager review / Peer/360 / Upward feedback)
- **Review period** (e.g. H1 2025, Q2 2025, Annual)
- **Name of person being reviewed** (or "myself" for self-assessment)
- **Role / level**
- **Key achievements or notable work** (rough notes are fine)
Back to top