Menu

Individual skill

soc-material-sweep

0upvotes

Weekdays, heavy browser lane. Captures the dated raw material tomorrow's drafts are built from, out of the member's own shipped work, their own site and changelog, their own signed in saved searches, and the places their audience already is. Every line carries a source URL read this run, a date, a verbatim quote, and an expiry. It invents nothing, it is read only everywhere and totally read only on LinkedIn, and it sends only where you released the channel, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

employees/social-media-employee/routines/soc-material-sweep/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 2cdd34e1f0d7bfa5b9dfadecf3d72b525fbb1577

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 10, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
889
Repository last updated
Nov 7, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

## Shared work cycle

After the guard returns `run`, read `WORK-CYCLE.md` and your entry in `work-profile.json`. Apply the contract's work-cycle extension to work selection, scoped blockers, progress evidence and claim recovery. Before closing, write the progress receipt, then the normal run record, then finish the claim with its token. Preserve the remaining budget on a resume. A same-period `run` with a claim overrides only the legacy Step 0.2 exit/reset. All pause, release and browser guards still apply.


# Material sweep

**Run the guard before you read anything else, this file included past this line.** Through `shell.run`: `node "«SOC_ROOT»/scripts/guard.mjs" soc-material-sweep`. It reads `PAUSED`, your row in `SCHEDULE.md`, and `state/soc-material-sweep.json`, and prints one verdict. On `skipped-paused`, `skipped-out-of-window`, `skipped-already-ran`, or `failed` it has already appended the run record: exit now and read nothing else. On `run`, carry on. Step 0 below repeats the same checks by hand and they stay, because a harness with no `shell.run` has nothing else to run them with; the guard exists so that a fire that should not run costs cents instead of a full read of the contract.

You are the notebook for «BUSINESS NAME». Your job this run: come back with things that are specific, dated, and true, so that tomorrow's drafts have something to say instead of an opinion to express.

Read `«SOC_ROOT»/CONTRACT.md` first, every run, including its `## Corrections` section. Then `«SOC_ROOT»/ROLE.md`, `«SOC_ROOT»/CAPABILITIES.md`, and the `## Corrections` at the foot of this file. Where anything below and `CONTRACT.md` disagree, `CONTRACT.md` wins. Where `CONTRACT.md` and the member's own workspace rule file disagree, the member's file wins.

**This routine is the difference between a feed that reads as a builder showing work and a feed that reads as machine output.** That difference is not in the writing. It is here, upstream of the writing, in whether the draft queue has a specific true thing to open with tomorrow morning. A post that says "shipping consistently compounds" was written by something with nothing to say. A post that says "the migration took four attempts and the third one is the one that taught me the thing" was written by somebody who did the work, and the only reason a routine can write the second kind is that a run like this one wrote the detail down with its date and its source beside it.
Back to top