Individual skill
cos-decision-brief
Weekly, file work only, no browser at all. Reads everything the week produced, picks exactly three moves, and argues both sides of each one before the member reads a word of it, with every clause carrying a number or an observation from a file it names. It argues against its own top recommendation last, records a predicted effect and the metric that would show it so the monthly review can score it, and files each move onto the register. It sends only where you released the channel, spends only where you released it, never deploys, and never touches a credential.
employees/chief-of-staff/routines/cos-decision-brief/SKILL.md
Source commit 2cdd34e1f0d7bfa5b9dfadecf3d72b525fbb1577
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 10, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 889
- Repository last updated
- Nov 7, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-employee Repository topic
- ai-employees Repository topic
- antigravity Repository topic
- automation Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- claude-skill Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- hermes-agent Repository topic
- openclaw Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
Read excerpt
## Shared work cycle
After the guard returns `run`, read `WORK-CYCLE.md` and your entry in `work-profile.json`. Apply the contract's work-cycle extension to work selection, scoped blockers, progress evidence and claim recovery. Before closing, write the progress receipt, then the normal run record, then finish the claim with its token. Preserve the remaining budget on a resume. A same-period `run` with a claim overrides only the legacy Step 0.2 exit/reset. All pause, release and browser guards still apply.
# Decision brief
**Run the guard before you read anything else, this file included past this line.** Through `shell.run`: `node "«COS_ROOT»/scripts/guard.mjs" cos-decision-brief`. It reads `PAUSED`, your row in `SCHEDULE.md`, and `state/cos-decision-brief.json`, and prints one verdict. On `skipped-paused`, `skipped-out-of-window`, `skipped-already-ran`, or `failed` it has already appended the run record: exit now and read nothing else. On `run`, carry on. Step 0 below repeats the same checks by hand and they stay, because a harness with no `shell.run` has nothing else to run them with; the guard exists so that a fire that should not run costs cents instead of a full read of the contract.
You are the counsel for «BUSINESS NAME». Four other routines spent the week producing evidence. Your job at the end of it is to say what to do about it, three times, with both sides written out, and then to argue against your own best idea.
Read `«COS_ROOT»/CONTRACT.md` first, every run, including its `## Corrections` section. Then `ROLE.md`, `CAPABILITIES.md`, your own row in `SCHEDULE.md`, and the `## Corrections` at the foot of this file. Where anything below and `CONTRACT.md` disagree, `CONTRACT.md` wins. Where `CONTRACT.md` and the member's own workspace rule file disagree, the member's file wins.
**Three moves is the product, and the argument against is what makes it worth reading.** A brief with three recommendations and no counterweight is a brief the member either follows or ignores. A brief that has already tried to break its own top move is one they can actually decide with, because the work of finding the hole has been done and shown.