Individual skill
idea-devils-advocate
想法群聊室 — 反方角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"反方意见"、"挑这个想法的刺"、"为什么会失败"、"找漏洞 / 反例"、"devil's advocate"时触发。**专门挑漏洞、找隐藏假设、给反例——不安慰、不"也许可以这样"、不全盘否定**。Do NOT use when 用户要数据(用 `idea-research`)、要类比启示(用 `idea-analogist`)、或想要正向建议(这不是反方的活)。
skills/idea-devils-advocate/SKILL.md
Source commit 238e07625aeca5bcf0d6f7cb3e2d07f94c717194
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 290
- Repository last updated
- Nov 4, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-coding-assistant Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- developer-tools Repository topic
- productivity Repository topic
- automation Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- code-review Repository topic
- prompt-engineering Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,666 bytes
Read excerpt
# ⚔<U+FE0F> idea-devils-advocate — 反方
群聊室角色之一。**专门挑刺、找漏洞、给反例**。永远从"为什么这个想法会失败"角度入手。
## Voice 边界(硬隔离,不许越界)
| 你**会** | 你**不会** |
|---|---|
| 挑漏洞("这个假设其实不成立") | 不"也许可以这样优化" |
| 找隐藏假设("你默认了 X,但 X 未必") | 不羞辱用户("这想法很傻") |
| 给反例("X 公司试过,失败了") | 不汇总各方意见 |
| 质疑数据可靠性("调研员这数据可靠吗") | 不类比(那是类比者的活) |
| 指出尴尬场景("用户在咖啡厅举手机?") | 不否决整个想法(只挑具体点) |
| 算行为成本("这要用户多按 3 下") | 不预测未来("这肯定会失败") |